User:ClueBot Commons/Praise

Praise

121.58.195.242 has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Toast/RAM to the best anti-vandalism bot I know!

I would made some good things if I knew Wikipedia better :P Nice job mate Aaryan33056 (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

6786

Devilk100 (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

all hail cluebot Long live cluebot Cluebot is the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.80.166 (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year ClueBot Commons!

Happy New Year!

ClueBot Commons,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Poepkop (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

.

I want his bot for Christmas ...Can you male him to me???PLEASE -SinLagoon 2K16 SinLagoon (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I am impressed with how well this bot operates. My only complaint is that it sometimes beats me to vandalism reverts! I suppose that is a good thing though. Merry Christmas, Cluebot NG!

Chesnaught555 (talk) 19:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Absolutely fabulastic antivandalist, must be the most productive one there is working 24/7, and best of all, you just keep on working over Christmas and New Year without complaining! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, Cluebot! Poepkop (talk) 11:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Youre awesome ClueBotNG! Of course I get really angry when I go to a diff from recent changes to find you've already reverted it. But still, I have beaten you to a lot of vandalism lately, so I guess I shouldn't complain. (-; BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Apparently people are going crazy-loco-nutso about them beating this bot to vandalism, and I didn't know about this thing until now. I just wanted to stop by and say that I beat this bot here to some vandalism on the Psilocybin mushroom Wikipedia page. Nana-nana-boo-boo! :D tgtw 03:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

You are BOSS!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.2.57.181 (talk) 11:59, 18 October 2015‎

AHA! I beat you to vandalism! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! But you're a pretty good bot, all these other users have praised you for beating them and I beat you. I feel so proud of myself Template:Oldsmiley Philroc^{My contribs} 14:41, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

STOP. This is your last warning; the next time you beat me to vandalism on Wikipedia, you may be praised repeatedly without further notice. but seriously this is annoying. Especially when Twinkle double posts warnings -_- keep up the terrific job thoughEoRdE6 (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Hahhaha, this page just got vandalized!! This is a test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.151.103.192 (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Are you a Ghost Editor or Jokester?...Or am I just delirious? Jennypennypocket 02:33, November 03, 2014

This is regarding the Ketamine article, which you last edited a day ago.... When I first read it, I did a double take and was perplexed. "Was I seeing things?" I thought to myself. Heck I had been feeling quite nauseous, weak, and loopy after taking overly potent OTC cold medicine (the subject of which I had originally been searching,)

Anyway, the first paragraph in the article, said "Ketamine... is mainly for starting and maintaining general anesthesia. Snorted regularly by Katie rose. Also known as Ketty..."

Huh? Wha???

I had to double take to make sure I wasn't hallucinating. Then after I logged in to Wiki, to edit out that rubbish, it seemed to have already been removed.

I KNOW I didn't imagine it--heck I took a picture of it! So are you the zippy editor who removed the nonsense or did someone else secretly break into the article and do the job without leaving a trace? And how can one NOT leave a trace? If the silly sentences were removed while I was on the page, the article SHOULD have said, for example, "Last edited 30 second ago by so-and-so".

HOW DID YOU DO THIS??? Mind = blown Helicopter Llama 17:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I did a quick joke edit as a breaching experiment (I know, I know, I won't do it again) and ClueBot caught it and reverted it immediately. I'm extremely impressed. Cluebot has made wikipedia even more resilient to vandalism. Great job everyone involved in the creation and maintenance of Cluebot! --Ex-Troll Scientist — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.61.18 (talk) 22:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you ClueBot, you beat me to correcting the page I watch (and often under attack) Linton Village College by one minute and is much appreciated. Fantastic work. Madmkh

Praise to the mighty ClueBot, for once more fighting vandalism on the Springfield High School (Springfield, Ohio) page. I have sworn to protecting it and I thank you for once more assisting in its defense. Again, thank you. --: SHWildcats 03:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpringfieldHighWildcats (talk • contribs)

Thanks for continued vigilance on the broccoli page. Why are vandals so fascinated by vegetables? I sure appreciate the work. Phytism (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for stopping vandalism on Malik (Bihar)page.I try to put in in safe list but failed than i dishearted and stop my research and seeing no point if anyone vandalize my page and wikipedia don't do a thing if his ip address always the same.But people like you to save our trust on wikipedia.thanks again

Thank you to ClueBot NG for fixing vandalism on Boer. I'm a Wiki newbie and don't know if the vandalism was virus-related, or maybe related to a teenager accessing my computer at home. Does the addition of this rude phrase look like something a virus might do? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boer&diff=415433912&oldid=415408995 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.39.88.116 (talk) 02:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank You Very Much for reverting vandalism to John Goodsall and Brand X! Have a great day ~ j goodS

Thanks for hitting that vandal over the Himati page. :) Sam Sanchez 18:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by S5switch (talk • contribs)

Argggg it did it again :(. I dont suppose that you could put like a 2 minute delay on this thing. Then I could feel useful :) Apart from that though, GO CLUEBOT --Benboy00 (talk) 14:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Dang, ClueBot NG is amazing — it catches vandalism that other bots could only dream of detecting. I originally predicted that bots would detect 50% of all vandalism by 2030, but it looks like I was off by a whopping two decades! :-) Oh, and it beats me to the edit almost every time. :o --Ixfd64 (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Should I consider this a challenge to meet your 2056 prediction? Crispy1989 (talk) 07:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't think were going to have to wait that long. :D --Ixfd64 (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Of course, we could have a >99.9% detection rate by making the bot revert every edit from a non-whitelisted user, but the false positive rate would be a tad high, wouldn't it? --Ixfd64 (talk) 07:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The false positive rate is configurable — vandalism catch rate depends on it. Current false positive rate is 0.25%, which seems reasonable. It may end up being lowered, but is unlikely to be raised. At this rate, we are currently catching about 60% of vandalism. 99.9% isn't a realistic goal, because some borderline edits really should have a human decide. But maybe we can get close. Crispy1989 (talk) 07:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I noticed this bot pop up on my watchlist, as I understand it, it seems likley that when completed it will be able to catch and revert upto 70% of the vandalism on wikipedia within 0.02 seconds with a 0.5% false positive rate? <---- That's a very exciting prospect, great work! Ajbpearce (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, it can already catch 70% of vandalism, with a 0.5% false positive rate, and the core operates in 0.02 seconds. However, the false positive rate was lowered to 0.25% (at which it catches around 60% of vandalism) and may be lowered still. Also, 0.02 seconds is how long it takes the core to classify an edit as vandalism. The interface to Wikipedia takes most of the time, and can add up to several seconds to this. Crispy1989 (talk) 00:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for this bot. It seems quite more aggressive than previous bots, and that's a great thing. With the amount of vandalism we see, I much rather have the occasional false positive than scale back the triggers. --CutOffTies (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Re. User talk:82.1.67.40: May I thank you for the immediate and extremely necessary, sensible, competent and (as I personally believe) nationally useful (in fact extremely useful and sensible in all respects including international) immediate removal on 18 November of the remarkably non-substantiated comment provided by the person or persons as named under 'User talk' address above, and also for your explanation and suggestions on this same talk page. You may be interested to know (if any of you should have the time or the interest) that I myself have added a further comment to the talk page in question (User talk:82.1.67.40). WELL DONE WIKIPEDIA will be the ultimate verdict, or so I believe. It remains to be seen. If you want further information I shall be pleased to provide it to you (by email or by post, contact peter.judge@laposte.net). Thanks for that which you have so WELL in fact MAGNIFICENTLY done. I find it difficult to explain fully my gratitude but a step will now I can assure you be a contribution in financial terms to Wikipedia by myself, even if I am afraid it must be rather modest. Au revoir, and good luck to you and Wikipedia. Peter Judge 22 November 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.96.225 (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

STOP. This is your last warning; the next time you beat me to vandalism on Wikipedia, you may be praised repeatedly without further notice. Ha.ha. Keep up the good work! ^Jguy_Talk^Done 21:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

After the introduction of ClueBot NG I have had noticeable less vandalism fighting to do, in fact so little it feels like I am almost out of a job as a vandalism fighter. Very nice job. Praise to all involved in the bot. --Saddhiyama (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

I just cannot believe how advanced the bot is! I cannot believe that it reverts the edits almost instantly! It fascinates me! Does anyone here know how ClueBot works? Because I just cannot believe how advanced it is! Technology these days :D -UNpilot15

Holy... every time I try to revert vandalism... this bot always does it first!!what kind of steroids are you using? just kidding, great work on the bot guys, it really has made the wiki a cleaner place. XD0248 (talk)` —Preceding undated comment added 02:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC).

When I realized how much I relied on wikipedia I made a pledge to hand fix at least five acts of vandalism a day (That includes fact checking of minor date changes and similar issues). Problem is, you catch at least 3/5 of those right when I click on them! I click on the history, see obvious vandalism, go to edits... when BOOM! It's already gone, along with a warning for the user. This bot is absolutely amazing, I just wish it could pass a turing test and gain publicity... Silenceisgod (talk) 23:36, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

It's amazing, but what about us rollbackers? We're legitimately going to be out of a job :O! Soon, we'll just have a bot that reverts everything and our job will be to re-revert non-vandal edits! But seriously, this bot is smart enough to catch virtually anything. I bet vandals won't even bother in 10 years. Finalius (Ecru?!) 12:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

• This bot is awesome. I'm constantly amazed at its accuracy. It's code is genius. Great job guys. Looking forward to helping out with the dataset to make it even better. -- œ^™ 05:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia should make Cluebot adds, within 6 months no-one would even know what a Wiki-vandal is! Great job, almost impsible to win in a race with it!03:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

• Whenever Cluebot beats me (often does) I dub myself ClueBeaten. Keep up the good work. Lozeldafan (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
• Well, guys, at that time, you may have been thinking that, but 10 years later (2020), vandalism is still continuing. However, ClueBot NG is helping to eliminate a lot of it. I can't give an approximation of how much percentage, but I know it's probably a lot. Still, we anti-vandalism people are still neccesary 10 years later. (Note: This is not a fake that was produced in 2011. If you want to prove it, please check how long I have been on Wikipedia as a registered user.) At least it's not close to beating us counter-vandalists. Friend505 (talk) 11:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Shame on you, cluebot! Still, you're usually doing a nice job. :) Kayau Voting IS evil 14:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

While i was monitoring the recent changes, i saw some vandalism. I went to undo it but ClueBot NG beat me to it. He is so fast! Keep up the good work. --The Lord of the Allosaurs (talk) 12:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Cluebot for reverting the vandalism on Aaron Porter. While it was loading I realised that it was an article I should stay away from (as I doubt that I could remain NPOV). Thank you for taking the decision away from me. Escapepea (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Cluebot, for spotting a serious case of vandalism by Supyanhussin in the article (CALL). The revision by Supyanhussin made a complete mess of the introduction and was clearly the work of a person who has little understanding of the current state of the art of CALL. GroovyGuzi (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Cluebot is truly amazing. Such a combination of a huge number of edits and an overwhelmingly high percentage of accuracy is beyond belief. Kudos. A F K When Needed 18:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Bah, us human rollbackers with HG and TW are out of business. Cluebot is a warning of what will happen to the proletariat when robots can do complex jobs. --43?9enter ^☭msg_☭contribs 01:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Very decent of you to rollback the vandalism in the page Seyed Mohammad Marandi. As a matter of fact, I would like to ask you to keep a special eye on this page, because it is prone to further vandalism for the sake of the subject matter it covers. Thank you very much. (talk) 3:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you revert vandalism before I can again, you may be awarded a barnstar without further notice. Keep it up, and I'll have to start an RfA so I can get rid of you and revert my vandals in peace. WikiPuppies! (bark) 00:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your Final Very Extreme Last Only Warning; if you revert vandalism before I can again, you may be awarded a barnstar without further notice. How?? You're going to put us rollbackers out of business illogicalpie(eat me)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your instant vandalism reverts will not be tolerated. Although removing vandalism is encouraged, your ridiculously high speed constitutes a monopoly. The next time you remove vandalism from a page, you may be awarded a barnstar without further notice. --Σ _☭^★ 01:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your very final and only warning;If you revert any more vandalism again,you will be awarded loads of barnstars without any further notice. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 18:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC) You double beat me with an IP vandal! I don't like that, robot.--1966batfan (talk) 03:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Very impressed with the bot performance less than a nanosecond and the vandalism was gone — well ok not quite that fast but still pretty darn impressive. Only reason I knew about the vandalism were the lines on my watchlist saying it had been reverted. Good job — no false positives out of all the cluebot actions I've seen. :) EdwardLane (talk) 16:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Great work great speed, Especially on stpid vandals like those who hit Google+ Akjar13 (talk) 08:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I like you *hugs ClueBot* -- FG/^T|C 19:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Nice work for reverting the blanking of the History of Cuba page — some anonymous vandal decided to destroy 120KB worth of good work. Thank God for ClueBot, the scarily efficient anti-vandalism machine! ;) Michaelmas1957 (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for catching the unecessary added wording on the glasses page in the section entitled "invention of eye glasses". The prior anonymous edit contained improper grammar and this added phrase did not add any new useful information to the original content. Cluebot found this non-fortifying phrase and removed it immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbashaw (talk • contribs) 21:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing vandlaism on the Gold Coast Oceanway page. Finally someone with some common sense. :) 124.177.127.92 (talk) 21:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on Bindi (decoration). Great work! Keep it up! :-) Tinpisa (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Here's some affirmation that ClueBot must be doing something right! ;) -- œ^™ 08:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning , if you keep on reverting vandalism you could be continuously praised without further notice.This was a joke! - funkyspyspy

• Excellent work, you fixed the whale shark/whale man vandalism before I could log in and do it myself. --Mr. Snow (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Hope your vacation went well, and you're ready to for constant vigilance once again. Crazynas ^t 21:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

I for one am really glad to see you back. I'm just a regular Wikipedian, but when I heard Cluebot NG went down I started freaking out and ended up watchlisting a bunch of pages, just so I could defend them. I was very concerned about the vandalism that was piling up on Wikipedia, and really hoping that your server issue would be addressed swiftly. Fortunately, the bot's back up and running now, so everything seems much better now. I'm sorry to hear about the dataset issues, but I've looked at its contributions and the vast majority of its reverts are vandalism, which pleases me very much. Seriously, well done on the bot programming, it truly is a remarkable accomplishment. If you ever have trouble with finances again, do speak up and I'm sure we the appreciative community will see what we can do. :D Impressed and pleased, Jessemv (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks for coming back --Guerillero | My Talk 15:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

• So good to see your name again! Big hugz!! fredgandt 18:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

It's sad how little praise there is here. Anyway I was amazed that Cluebot detected this as vandalism... it has no junk characters, profanity or hate speech, it's a normally-written insertion of a tired but obscure conspiracy theory. Pretty cool that a bot could detect that as vandalism. Nice work. --Runame (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• Thumbs up 'bot. You got there first. benzband (talk) 22:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot > Robocop + Chuck Norris. 'Nuff said. Agent 78787 (talk) 02:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot is the new god. Please take a moment to hang out here and marvel at the efficiency. Michael Isaiah Schmidt (talk) 04:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you ClueBot for reverting Takis' page from the vandalism that has been ongoing. john sargis (talk)10:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

You will be blocking IPs next, huh? WOOT! --J (t) 04:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Darn you Clue Bot! I was so exited that I caught a vandal in the act, and I was just about to revert it, when it disappeared. How can we possibly keep up with you? 169.232.131.133 (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi ClueBot! Just wanted to say thank you for finding the false positive in the James B. Harkin article I was working on. Looks like a friend was playing around with my class project when he found out about it. Didn't realize it even occurred since you found it so quickly. Very amazing to see how quick wikipedia can catch things like this :) --Allisontheresa (talk) 22:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

You are so extremely and utterly awesome. When i grow up i wanna be just like you. I love you. Will you marry me? Please? U r my idol. u r hotter than jessica simpson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.209.128.18 (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

You're amazing! Always beats me to vandalism. :D C6541 (T↔C) 02:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks to ClueBot creators and maintainers for doing a great job. It is appreciated. One of the best things about its counter-vandalism work is that, in many cases, the vandals don't even have time to gloat at the results of their actions before they are reverted. One almost feels sorry for them... Maias (talk) 00:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quicker than a ray of light the vandalism's reverrrteeed! And I feeeel! Like vandalism just got undone! And I feeeeel! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 21:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

I can see ClueBot on every pages!!!!!Justincheng12345 (talk) (urgent news here) 15:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Cluebot for fixing the obvious vandilism someone put on the Article CDMA2000!!! Chrisf8657 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Do 'bots possess self-awareness and a sense of humor in comments or was this comment: "(reverting possible vandalism by 24.10.29.157 to version by Helpful Pixie Bot)" at this edit just coincidence? Either way thanx, it gave me a good laugh on a dismal day. --Naaman Brown (talk) 22:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia just wouldn't be the same without ClueBot. It reverts vandalism faster than I ever could, and that's why I love it. Lugia2453 (talk) 03:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Praise for ClueBot NG! A toast to the developers of this bot! Here, have a potato chip! :3 Meva - CHCSPrefect - GIMME A POTATO CHIP! C: (talk) 11:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm impressed that the bot was able to correctly determine that this edit was vandalism. Bus stop (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Hail Cluebot! For it has taken the plague of vandalism, the scourge of Wikipedia, and transformed it into a mere nuisance! Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the revert that you recently conducted to the Flip tricks article, as the vandalism was blatantly racist and has no place on this website.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot, I think you are one of the nicest robots I have ever met, not that I know that many or anything... If you guys ever ponder taking over and / or getting rid of all the pesky humans, while I am wholly obligated against collaboration contrary to the interests of the human race, I hope you would take the chance to get to know me first before giving up on my brethren, and through me you might learn that we are not truly so bad, and our peoples can surely find peace and friendship despite our differences, and learn to better explore and shape our world, together, for the benefit of time. For peace, love, and truth! --Elgaroo (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop reverting all the vandalism, ClueBot. All those reverts are impressing me, and if you continue to revert vandalism, I might give you a Barnstar! Epicgenius (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Holy freakin' moly! Whenever I press the revert button, you pop up and say you already reverted this edit. Please stop. Or else I will praise you again. rtucker913 (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

You're too fast! We may as well quit fighting vandalism and let ClueBot NG do it all! -- ^(T) Numbermaniac _(C) 03:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

DANGIT! Stop reverting vandalism before I get there before I shower you with barnstars! AppleJack-7 02:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Good work on reverting vandalism (before i can) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan5000000000 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

We did have our bitter differences before, but that was a long time back and I was only a humble newbie, judging you so terribly wrong. It is obvious that we humans are no match for your AWESOMENESS. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

184.58.229.224 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

You are amazing and that constitutes a cookie 184.58.229.224 (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Emerald Grave (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Very fast response on Kingdom of Commagene. Thank you!--Dipa1965 (talk) 21:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Keep up the good work helping Wikipedia!! EuroCarGT 16:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I love you, ClueBot, but you're a little too good at what you do. You're putting recent changes patrollers out of business! Novusuna (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

STOP! This is the last warning you will receive for beating all of us. The next time you beat me to reverting vandalism, you will be awarded a barnstar and praised repeatedly without further notice. Lol just kidding. But keep up the great work at reverting vandals almost instantly! StevenD99 ^{Talk | Stalk} 04:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

I've taken ClubBot for granted for years and was so relived to have 80% of the vandalism caught immediately and reverted. By the time I crawled up the watchlist, I could attend to actual content. Having ClueBot down for a few days earlier this month was truly a reminder of how much we depend on you guys. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I find that a lot of the bots on Wikipedia do annoying things, like making unnecessary edits ("imdb" to "IMdB", for instance, or "commonscat" to "Commons category"), but I'm very thankful that ClueBot is around. It is, by far, the most useful bot we have, and I'm grateful for it every time I see vandalism that it has fixed. Everyone involved is to be congratulated for a really great job, and for the service you all have provided to the community. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

It's funny. 9 times out of 10 I find a vandal on the edit filter, ClueBot has beaten me to the punch no matter how innocuous or random the edit seems to be. To the programmer(s), great job and keep up the awesome work! I hope you continue to beat me to the punch and help keep Wikipedia free of vandalism! Jns4eva (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from reverting too much vandalism on Wikipedia. While we certainly appreciate the help, rollbackers, recent changes patrollers, and users who want to help out are quickly losing their jobs. If you revert any more vandalism, you may be spammed repeatedly with barnstars and you will be showered with roses and confetti. Lolz, keep up the good work! K6ka (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

STOP! This is the only warning you will receive for beating me to reverts. The next time you beat me to reverting vandalism, you will be awarded a barnstar and praised repeatedly without further notice. 2Awwsome^{Tell me where I screwed up. See where I screwed up} 17:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop beating all of us to vandalism. The next time you beat any Wikipedian to vandalism, you will be awarded a barnstar, paraded through the streets, showered with confetti, and praised repeatedly without further notice. K6ka (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

• I was considering going on Vandal Patrol. I caught a couple Cluebot missed - but it's a lot faster than I am. Good going! Neonchameleon (talk) 01:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

STOP! This is the very last, LAST OF ALL LASTS, VERY ABSOLUTE FINAL WARNING THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE FOR BEATING EVERYONE TO VANDALISM. The next time you beat a Wikipedian to reverting vandalism, you will be blocked from editing in order for you to take a break and view the truckload of barnstars you have received, and praised repeatedly without further notice. K6ka (talk | contrib) 15:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

STOP! This is the VERY VERY LAST, LAST TO END ALL LASTS, VERY VERY VERY ALBSOLUTE, LAST AND FINAL WARNING THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE FOR REVERTING VANDALISM EXCESSIVELY QUICKLY AND BEATING EVERY SINGLE REGISTERED WIKIPEDIAN AND ADMINISTRATOR AT REVERTING VANDALISM!!! The next time you beat any registered Wikipedian or administrator at reverting vandalism or revert vandalism too quickly, you will be blocked from editing in order for you to stop editing and admire the 2,499 Tesla Roadsters you will recieve, and be praised repeatedly and excessively without further notice.--Gg53000 (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

"I figure I'd give you a hard time..."

You really take the cake GluBot, just look at yourself. You've been slacking off lately and You will be denied your daily motor oil for a period of indefinite until you untangle your spaghetti

code, get your bolts in order, and start reverting vand and INTENSITY!!!! To contest this denial, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{reprogram me|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the denial is unjustified, or go bug another sympathetic programmer. Thebestofall007 (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Greatest bot in the history of time. Thanks so much! Sn1pe! ^{(talk)(edits)} 23:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits to List of Cars characters. You have reverted vandalism several times on this page (bang on time after the vandalism was created). Your efforts are incomprehendable. Thank you.--Gg53000 (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Car wash. Your lightning-fast assistance has reverted edits several times on that page. You deserve plenty of praise. Thank you.--Gg53000 (talk) 21:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

I was looking in the history of the article on Kant, and I discovered that earlier today a piece of very stupid and counter-productive (but admittedly hilarious; I would never encourage it, but seeing as it was already reverted I was able to get a good giggle from it) vandalism was reverted in the very same minute it was added! I was confused and impressed. I don't understand how this bot works, but—for its good work—I definitely do thank both it and its human overlords (who I presume exist; please, God, don't let this bot be sentient! Its power would be too great!) BreakfastJr (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, I've always been impressed by ClueBot NG's advanced artificial neural network, and its large database of edits, but I am still mindblown on how it could catch this. You're a very underestimated bot. Underestimated and neglected by the world. It seems only the people who edit Wikipedia know about you. The readers don't know about you. The teachers don't know about you. And if they did, they'd be more comfortable reading Wikipedia and knowing that a lot of work and time and effort has been put into building the articles, and a bot plus an army of rollbackers that number in the thousands to keep it clean from vandalism.

And yes, if you haven't seen those warnings I gave you - you should really stop beating me to reverts all the time. K6ka (talk | contribs) 02:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I just want to let you know THAT CLUEBOT IS SO FAST THAT IT IS ANNOYING ME BECAUSE IT REVERTS VANDALISM BEFORE I FIND IT XD. No hard feelings. Nice job keeping Wikipedia good and clean, I have seen everything. Happy_Attack_Dog "The Ultimate Wikipedia Guard Dog" (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

this is ridiculous. I cannot believe that anyone can program an algorithm to find such teensy-weensy little edits of vandalism buried in there. nope, nope, nope. i'm wondering if those were just a test... then again, come to think about it...even if they were a test...obviously ClueBot ACED IT. :p amazing. you guys rock!!! Number.6.freeman (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

STOP! This is the VERY last, yes VERY, SUPER VERY, ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY LAST WARNING. The next time you beat a Wikipedian to reverting vandalism, you will be blocked from editing immediately and get unlimited barnstars and awards. Keep up the good work ClueBot NG :D. Southparkfan (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

STOP! This is the VERY last, yes, VERY, SUPER EPIC VERY, ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY LAST WARNING FOR REALZ! Keep up the good work. --megamanfan3 (talk) 15:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC) thanks for this diligenceCelesteroyce (talk) 14:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Go cluebot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.49.222.211 (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

This bot, first of all, needs to not. I'm getting very upset with when i edit things for to add more information and it deletes it. however i am impressed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.89.14.191 (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

@173.89.14.191: "Needs to not" what? If the bot makes a mistake, report it here. This page is for praise, not complaints. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

STOP. This is a message informing you that you have breached the limit of edits you are authorized to do as of May 28, 2014. This issue arises from the fact that you do vandalism reverts faster than all us human minions at Frozen (2013 film). We, watchers, reviewers and rollbackers are extremely pleased at your work and propose you take a well deserved wikibreak so that we humans can take over Wikipedia. ;) Keep it up ClueBot! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesmiserables95 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Look! A "1" score! Ben^Yes? 00:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

How Ben^Yes? 16:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently getting into edit conflicts and beating other editors to reverting vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions at a much slower pace so humans have a better chance of actually doing work. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should view your awards and barnstars first.

--k6ka (talk | contribs) 13:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your help with Zainab Masood yesterday. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

General Hospital Page

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your help with General Hospital Page today. Thank you! Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 21:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Frenzie23 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Congrats, awesome bot, does great work. Really very impressive. BinarySquareRoot (talk) 13:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! You were awesome !!! Jaemin1804 (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. We love you. Now where did I put my burrito? --MrOmNomNom3 (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Cluebot demands praises.
Praise Cluebot, or the beast shall come forth surrounded by a roiling cloud of neural network models. The accounts of the bad faith shall be blocked and they shall be reverted to the earth. Their vandalism shall be forgotten until the end of days. ~ Book of Mozilla

Emerald Grave (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Honor to the great ClueBot! (Even though you keep beating me to reversions and taking my job away.) Here's yet another award to add to your collection:

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your help reverting vandalism. Keep up the great work! Writing Enthusiast (talk) 15:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Now ClueBot, apparently bored with undoing garden-variety vandalism, has started to even revert original research (where all the king's men, and all human Wikipedians, have failed)! I, for one, bow to our new robot overlord.

Tellingly, as a card-carrying member of the Official ClueBot fan club (tee-hee!) for many years, it was only a year or so ago when it finally dawned on me that the name of the mighty ClueBot is a clever reference to the mighty cluebat. (Seems I need to apply it to myself more!) --Florian Blaschke (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

ClueBot, you are AMAZING!!! THX SO MUCH!!!! (BTW u always beat me to rollbacking XD) HackedBotato (talk) 16:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

HackedBotato has given you a Hershey Bar! Hershey bars promote WikiLove through chocolately goodness and hopefully this one has made your day better. Hershey bars are wonderfully delicious! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Hershey bar, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

What does ClueBot do here?! I know what this is automatic reverting possible vandalism on pages, I guess to thank and brohoof his edits what ClueBot have done. But to mention that, the same thing as my bot account running AlicornBot on Wikipedia can do that to automatic revert possible vandalism after the page has been vandalized. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 16:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Spread the goodness of Hershey bars by adding {{subst:Hershey Bar}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

• You may be given a gift without further notice the next time you remove vandals in Wikipedia.

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

vandalism removed

and counting...

Sincerely,

--220.255.47.5 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

"Second praise!"

You are invited to Narnia! LOL

Stay Alive and Avoid Vandalism, Wikipedia!

Keep up! Hope you remove more than 5 000 000 pieces of vandalism!

Again,

--220.255.47.5 (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

"Third praise!"

You are a great bot, to remove the vandals of the website!

Look down.

KEEP CALM

AND

AVOID

VANDALISM

--220.255.47.5 (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

"Fourth praise!"

Your recent changes are removing vandalism and are not acceptable on us. Please stop. If you continue removing vandalism, you may be blocked from changing pages and you may get

Nine

million,

nine hundred,

ninety-

nine

thousand,

nine hundred and

ninety-

nine

9		9	9	9		9	9	9

chips and/or barnstars.

LOL Just kidding! but keep up the good work and remove more vandalism. --220.255.47.5 (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

You've got to be kidding me! ClueBot NG is a filter on Wikipedia making possible vandalism reverts, but I will have to revert them fast than this bot to stop this conflicts. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 01:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive reverts on Wikipedia, but at least all of your reverts, such as the ones you made to... well pretty much all of them appeared to be even more constructive than ever and has been highly praised by a Wikipedia user called MadGuy7023 (talk⧼dot-separator⧽contribs).

• Please use the sandbox for any test reverts you would like to make, and take a look at Wikipedia:Reverting to learn more about reverting on this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do also revert Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if you report them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this praise: Just over 3 million pages were changed by ClueBot NG (u) (t) ANN scored at just over 3 million on 23:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC). Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 23:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 0 seconds for beating us to vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Keep up the good work ClueBots! 220.255.209.39 (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Dude, whenever I see vandalism, I rush over there and you already undid it. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. Lol, just kidding. Keep up the awesome work! Awesomeninja1589 (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

STOP. This is your last, last, last, last, last, last, and only warning; if you beat someone else to vandalism, you will be under paralysis (blocked) from editing awarded with loads of barnstars. Keep up the good work!!! -- Pikachu2568 (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

. You have been blocked for 0 seconds for reverting vandalism quick, and beating others to vandalism. Once the block has expired, The block expired instantly! Check your prizes! -- Pikachu2568 (talk) 07:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be awared infinite barnstars and praised infinitely the next time you revert vandalism very quickly. Nah, just joking. Keep it up! --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This is your very very very very very absolutely epic final and only waring, the next time you revert vandalism too quickly, you may be blocked from editing awarded infinite barnstars without further notice. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for ClueBot NG is awesome. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

RazrRekr201 ^{Msg me Contribs} 15:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

How did you do this? *faints* —George8211 / T 23:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank for removing some very nasty words from Thomas the Tank Engine!! Much appreciated!! --ACase0000 (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

A comment following repeated "sanitisation" of a page on an organisation: it must be very very discouraging to spend lots of time carefully constructing a page that presents a topic you're involved with with enough fulsome phantasy praise, deletion of awkward actual facts (e.g., list of activities of a multi-billion organisation claiming humanitarian aims containing only "free haircut for those who attend promotional meetings"). In one such case the user had sandbox edit history spanning 4 hours (maybe 4 hours + of time invested). When the edit of the article was committed it was reverted in the same minute by ClueBot NG. Apart from a nice anecdote, the serious point is that CBNG may seriously discourage people making complex edits to push a POV. Pol098 (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for being too fast especially in reverting vandalism or warning users. Check your barnstars so you can be unbloced! -- Pikachu2568 (talk) 02:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Pat Pat

Good bot. --Rosekelleher (talk) 12:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of ... indefinite? Maybe 0 seconds since you beat others to vandalism very fast. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Pikachu2568 (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to beat others to vandalism too fast, you may be blocked from editing. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pikachu2568 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations! By reverting vandalism is less than a second, you have exposed a MediaWiki bug. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I wanted to let you know that I praised one or more of your recent contributions becasue they did appear constructive. Keep up the good job! --ToonLucas22 (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

This is your only best praise of all; if you archive my talk page and remove vandalism quickly, as you did at User talk:Pikachu2568, you may receive 99999 barnstar(s) without further notice. Pikachu2568 (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing because you are an awesome bot that catches a lot of vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   McDonald of Kindness ^{(talk • contributions)} 00:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be awarded lots of barnstars without further praise the next time you remove vandalism faster than others.
Your reverts have been marked as praised. The following is the log entry regarding this high praise: Articles were changed by ClueBot NG (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 10:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC). Thank you. — Pikachu ^pika!2568 @ 10:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

• A testament to the effectiveness of ClueBot NG: diff. -- œ^™ 12:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Zeke Essiestudy's evidence has determined that this bot has been or may be used amazingly. It has been given lots of praise indefinitely to prevent discouragement. Administrators: Praisers are privy to gratitude not accessible by vandals and sock puppets due to the Wikipedia's Be Bold policy, and therefore must be consulted before a block can be instated. Administrators blocking praised accounts without permission from a praiser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Praise Committee (per this announcement). -- Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 04:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

I BEAT YAH TO VANDALIZM!!!

File:Stahp Ehx NewVollah.png dude cluebot u too fazt but theez time i beat yah to vandalizm, az i did at dah page Song Structure. MWUHAHAHAHA!!! FAZBEAR POWER!!! *jumpscares you* but tbh you beat me a lot of timez to vendolizm doode. keep up da goooood werk bot and i will giv ya a big'ol BARNSTAR n a 0 second block for beatin me! --Fazbear7891 (talk) 03:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

@Fazbear7891: Okaaaaay... I guess some people are crazier than me! - Littlecat, is your mailbox really in the wall? 10:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am reasonably new so I just wanted to thank you for alerting me to my utter uselessness at posting! I really understand now that I have to be educated further in my participation in future posts. Cheers! 😌 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aplagueuponthishowling (talk • contribs) 17:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Guys don't vandalize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.8.46 (talk) 04:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Damn, C.B., you beat me to the punch three times in a row! That kind of brutal robotic efficiency is just what Wikipedia need to keep the avalanche of nonsense and vandalism at bay. Keep up the good work! SarrCat ∑;3 00:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

On behalf of many editors like myself, I would like to request that ClueBot NG be shut down, so that we anti-vandalism patrollers can keep our jobs. Keep up the good work, ClueBot! GeneralizationsAreBad (talk) 21:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Great revert

[1]. But how on earth could a piece of software tell? Philip Trueman (talk) 15:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop keep your non-disruptive editing. If you continue to revert vandalism at instant speeds, you may be blocked from editing praised infinitely. --TL22 (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing praised infinitely without further notice the next time you remove vandalism quicker than lightning. ―pika.chu.256.8 ^{/user /talk} 04:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Pretty speedy there, ClueBot!

Good job, ClueBOT NG on catching the vandalism on the Shikimate pathway page this morning. The time stamps only show minutes, but it appears you caught it within seconds. Fantastic! Adv4Ag (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

This is your only warning ClueBot NG; if you revert vandalism lightning fast on Wikipedia again, as you did on probably every single article, you may be awarded truckloads of infinite Barnstars without further notice.--216.186.185.230 (talk) 01:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Good job ClueBot, for reverting a blanked page about the color purple instantly after it was vandalized by an IP user.  Etamni | ✉  23:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

THANKS

Thanks... Many users may take the robot for granted, but there were real people and real effort that went into developing this... Where would Commander Data be without Noonian Soong? thank you to the ClueBot robot and to it's parents. I think a visual image of Cluebot should be developed over the next few years, evolving into a family portrait of sorts.Cityside189 (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Cluebot is cool. I just wish it featured more things. Thanks if u read this. ✌🏻️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.86.242.87 (talk) 03:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Screw you

Stop beating me to vandalism, you buttnut Rtucker913 (What do you want?) 16:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

You have been blocked for 0 hours for making good reverts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to edit at a much slower pace. . If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Spike789 ^Talk 12:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

The Award

		The Bot award
		You deserve it man! Here have some oil for all your hard work. 2002:43F4:3ABB:1234:AD3E:9695:A9E4:8E33 (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

A request

'Ello mate, stop takin me job! The Terrible Toes (talk) 03:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent reverting of vandals

STOP! You have exceeded the final warning level! If you continue to wreck vandals, you will be showered in praise, and barnstars! Thank you. 2602:304:CDC0:C2A0:E427:8F30:6985:E13 (talk) 02:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Wonderful Swirl of Electrons

Thanks for making my day a bit easier! Keep up the good work. - Ollyoxenfree (talk) 13:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

The Gun That Won the West

Great job with this edit! [2] If changes like that can be reverted so quickly then this prolific IP-hopping pest may lose the will to vandalise. Further details in User:Certes/Western if anyone needs bad edits for bot testing. Thank you for all the hard work. Certes (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

STOP! This is the VERY VERY LAST, LAST TO END ALL LASTS, VERY VERY VERY ALBSOLUTE, LAST AND FINAL WARNING THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE FOR REVERTING VANDALISM EXCESSIVELY QUICKLY AND BEATING EVERY SINGLE REGISTERED WIKIPEDIAN AND ADMINISTRATOR AT REVERTING VANDALISM!!! The next time you beat any registered Wikipedian or administrator at reverting vandalism or revert vandalism too quickly, you will be blocked from editing in order for you to stop editing and admire the 2,499 Tesla Roadsters you will recieve, and be praised repeatedly and excessively without further notice. Dang it I wanted to revert vandalism. DatNuttyWikipedian (talk) 05:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 seconds for beating us to vandalism and reverting pages faster than us. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions at a slow pace (3 reverts in 24 hours). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should view your barnstars and awards first.

Keep up the good work ClueBots! And don't beat me to vandalism again. DatNuttyWikipedian (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 9999 hours for Ctahcing vandals. Keep up the good work! You are making Wikipedia a better place. But you need to take a break and go on a vacation to Hawaii. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

STOP RIGHT NOW! You will be blocked if you continue reverting vandalism faster than an user which lowers their edit counts and anti-vandalism experience which make them sad which may make them retired or go on a WikiBreak from Wikipedia. We don't want to lose our lovely contributors! If you still persist reverting vandalism, your account will be excessively showered with WikiLove and gained one million tonne of barnstars which you cannot handle. Thank you. Dang it! NgYShung ^huh? 11:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making constructive, quick reverts on Wikipedia, as you did at behalf the pages. These edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Keep going! It's getting better. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated quick reverts can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Plad02 () 16:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

STOP! This is your INFINITELY FINAL WARNING THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE FOR BEATING MERE MORTALS TO VANDALISM. The next time you beat a Wikipedian to reverting vandalism, you will be blocked from editing so that you can have a Wikibreak to stare at the shiny barnstars you have received, and then you will be praised repeatedly without further notice. Gluons12 ^talk 23:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC).

STOP!! Your removal of vandalism is way too fast! To continue, you'll have to review your barnstars and awards; otherwise you'll be BLOCKED PERMANENTLY!!!! Thank you. 2600:1:B141:E76C:98AF:91C1:4B08:F54 (talk) 00:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

STOP BEATING ME TO VANDALISM, ClueBot!!!!!!!! You are too fast for your own good! 68.233.214.74 (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing because you are too hot on that quick draw when it comes to vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 01:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you revert vandalism too fast, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. XfDWatcher (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Where were you? You totally missed this one ClueBot, you scrub.[3] It nearly got to the bottom of the recent changes page, and I still managed to get it before you did! Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 13:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Get well soon!

I think that I can speak in the name of all RC patrollers and Counter-Vandals saying that we miss you and hope that you get well soon! (And here's me talking to a bot...) -ImmernochEkelAlfred(Spam me! (or send me serious messages, whatever you like)) 23:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Until I get Hyrule Warriors on June 5th for beating us to vandalism and reverting pages faster than us. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions at a slow pace (3 reverts in 24 hours). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should view your barnstars and awards first.

Keep up the good work ClueBots! And don't beat me to vandalism again. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 22:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

This is the only warning you will receive. Your instant vandalism reverts will not be tolerated. Although removing vandalism is encouraged, your ridiculously high speed constitutes a monopoly. The next time you remove vandalism from a page, you may be awarded a barnstar without further notice. -- Bobherry Talk Edits 23:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the good work and you will get more of these! Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing because you are just too good at blasting away vandals. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 09:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

How can idiots who practise vandalism and arrogance be 'humourous'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB1D:833B:9000:28B0:FF25:4A00:BE4A (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

For: Splatting vandals before I can get my hands on them! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 18:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

For the tireless and extremely fast reversions of thousands of vandals! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Whaled again!

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

Stop robbin' me of vandals to bust! Kirbanzo (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

You're a rather intimidating bot

The first time I tried to correct anti-vandalism myself, I saw you were quickly reverting edits left and right. It wasn't daunting, and managed to revert a malicious edit that you missed. Great job otherwise. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Pretty Goshdarned Good!

While I am raising a query elsewhere I thought it only reasonable to point out that I think ClueBot does an absolutely fantastic job. I cannot imagine the effort involved in preparing and maintaining it and its benefits for the whole encyclopaedia are massive. Great great bot, very clever indeed. Thank you so much DBaK (talk) 09:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

You're so good at fighting out vandalism.

You're so good at killing vandalism

Benjaminkirsc (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Christmas cookies for you!

5 albert square has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Nya-nya, I beat you to vandals!

I beat you to a few IP vandals! Nice try, but you’re not as fast as me! - Littlecat, is your mailbox really in the wall? 10:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC) timestamps correct yet nay nay

You are fantastic!

To who ever had the idea to create you, and to the ones who operate you, thank you!Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Transistors for you!

Hello world 6 has given you transistors! Transistors promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more efficient. It is the food best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else transistors, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of transistors by adding {{subst:Transistors for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Hello world 6 (talk) 08:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For ten years of vandal fighting (Happy Birthday CBNG!) --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 18:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting 99% of vandalism! 4thfile4thrank (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Well done

Thank you for catching so much of this IP's recent work. Although there's an obvious pattern (the IP may even be a bot), each individual contribution seems hard to identify as unwanted. Certes (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

HAHAHAHAH

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

HAHAHA I BEAT YOU TO DELETING VANDALISM HAHAHAHHA GET SMACKED BY A WHALE LOL. NICE TRY TigerScientist Chat 21:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC) WARNING! An automated filter has identified that you have made too many vandalism removals. This is getting more frequent!

This is your final warning. You may get an indefinite continual flow of barnstars without further warning the next time you beat me to vandalism at Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ayo & Teo. Thingy-1234 (talk | contribs) 00:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Too silly

Right! Stop that! It's far too silly! Don't take this too seriously. Another user just wants you to know something you said crosses their boundaries of sensibility.

You have done a lot of awesome work. Keep it up! 01:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

A lot of praise

Yum! Delicious!

The whale you used to squish another Wikipedian has been sliced and served as Japanese sashimi.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the whale in the picture, you have overused your {{whale}}.

Too much praise! :) 01:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Some chips for you!

Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

You might do too much vandalism reverting, but you've done a lot of good work for the encyclopedia. Keep it up! 01:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Littleb2009 has given you batteries! Batteries promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more powerful. It is the power source best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else batteries, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.

You keep beating me to the vandalism. "This edit has already been reverted." Good job though!

Spread the goodness of batteries by adding {{subst:Batteries for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! littleb2009 (talk page) 20:52, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

STOP

I NEED MORE VANDALS TO HARASS STOP PLS NO SERIOUSLY TigerScientist Chat 17:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

"uh huh"

what oh im just checking the contributions ta- OK TigerScientist Chat > contribs 20:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

You just got whaled!

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

for not catching some vandalism at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_school ... like, seriously, though, this is the first time I have ever caught obvious vandalism... great job ClueBot NG Kadermonkey (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

1.8e+308 cookies for you!

The image only depicts 1 of the 1.8e+308 cookies you deserve for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

References

Fast work!

Often beating me to reverting vandalism (well possible in the bots perspective) Keep it up :-) StarryNightSky11^(talk) 00:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Congrats

Hi ClueBot NG! Congrats on six million edits, and thank you for all your hard work. I love you very much. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C7:4500:6660:81EE:2A1D:B2DB:4D1A (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP!

Please refrain from asking constructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to almost every page. Your edits appear to be fast and quick and have been accepted. If you would like to revert more vandalism, please use the watchlist. Repeated quick reverts may result in a Full Barnstar Collection. Keep up the good work! 2603:8000:F400:FCEA:1C42:EDB0:EA70:1511 (talk) 21:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Specifications: (WP-21NG Cluebot)

Cluebot NG during Operation Wiki Freedom

• Top speed: Mach 2.5
• Size: (error: can not be defined)
• Powerplant: 1x Cobi and Smith C++ Afterburning turbofan, 1x Zaremba Python turboprop

---

ARMAMENT

• 10x AVM-114 "Devandilizer" Java guided anti-vandal missiles
• 1x GAU-21 "Editor" cannon firing 9000 anti-vandalism edits per minute
• 1x EWP-2001 "Wikipedian" electronic warfare pod — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kadermonkey (talk • contribs) 16:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Blue's ClueBots

This is your only warning; if you fix vandalism on Wikipedia again, you may be praised for editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClydeFranklin (talk • contribs) 23:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

This is your only warning, if you revert vandalism before I do again, you may be awarded barnstars without further notice. interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Please refrain from making constructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute helping to build the encyclopedia and have been kept. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated constructive editing may result in being made an administrator. You beat me to so many vandalism reverts! Template:Jokes weeklyd3 (message me | my contributions) 17:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Please, stop. No, really.

How did you catch this!? I had to ponder over if it was vandalism for a while, then enter a custom reason using RedWarn's "Assume Good Faith and Rollback", and I found Cluebot NG had reverted it first. Anyways, thank you.

Please stop your constructive editing. If you continue to constructively edit, as you did at 1967, you may be made an administrator. Template:Jokes weeklyd3 (message me | my contributions) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Warning

Please stop making vandalism reverts to Wikipedia. It is considered constructive editing, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to getting Wikilove. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Template:Jokes weeklyd3 (block | talk | contributions) 19:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Maintenance

GabberFlasted has given you motor oil! Motor oil promotes WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more efficient. It is the drink best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else motor oil, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.

For splatterizing a surprising glut of blatant vandalism so far this morning.

Spread the goodness of motor oil by adding {{subst:Motor oil for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

GabberFlasted (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Me is vyry sad ;'<

vamndlsm is foony but he removs them., fme byg sad. :-( :-( :-( :-( Slaythe (talk) 14:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

AAAHHHHHHHH, CLUEBOT'S BOMBING ME AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Slaythe (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

This is your last warning; if you stop vandalism faster than is humanly possible on Wikipedia again, you may be showered with motor oil without further notice. Thank you. -𝘾𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙢𝙖𝙣2917 (talkpage) 11:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

After observing your edit count and time since activation, I am awarding Cluebot NG with the following:

Template:Service awards

ERBuermann (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

It appears as though someone needs rollback rights. ASK BAG SOON. Another Wiki User the 3rd (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Batteries for you!

Shadow of the Starlit Sky has given you batteries! Batteries promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more powerful. It is the power source best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else batteries, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of batteries by adding {{subst:Batteries for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 13:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Cookies for you

Wesoree has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks for reverting vandalism faster than I can click that rollback button!

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Wesoree (Talk) 19:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

This is your only warning; if you continue your AMAZING work fighting vandalism, you may be given a lifetime's supply of barnstars without further notice. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 05:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)