Template:Did you know nominations/Abdul Ghani Azhari

Abdul Ghani Azhari

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Abdul Ghani Azhari wrote Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar in Urdu, detailing the ancient history of Gujjars in India? Source: sourced in article
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mass Incidents in China
  • Comment: This seems a legit hook to me.

Created by TheAafi (talk). Self-nominated at 17:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC).

• @TheAafi: Can you write an article about Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar?–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 18:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

  Although I feel we should have an article about this book, I have not got that much time right now to write about the book. Please also let me know if this is a general question or are you reviewing the DYK nomination? ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 18:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

General question.–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 06:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

• — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandarax (talk • contribs)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New Enough: Y Long Enough: Y

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Y Neutral: Y Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Y

Hook eligibility:

• Cited: Y
• Interesting: N - n

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @TheAafi: To be honest, I don't think the hook is that interesting. Could another be proposed? Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

• Onegreatjoke, Thanks for the review. What do you think about the following hook? I would be happy if you can make some changes to the hook with regards to style and grammar. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
• ALT1: ... that despite being interested in the Qadiri sufi order, Abdul Ghani Azhari published works on the Naqshbandi order?
• ALT1a: ... that Abdul Ghani Azhari published works on the Naqshbandi sufi order whilst being more interested in the Qadiri order?
  • @Onegreatjoke:, in case you missed the previous ping? ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

@TheAafi: Truthfully, I don't think that these are that interesting either. Maybe i'm not seeing it but I don't find these all that interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke:, Alt1a appears pretty much interesting and hooky to me and perhaps you are not getting it because this belongs to a subject where you don't contribute. It is okay and you can leave the nomination to be reviewed once again by someone else who knows the subjective stuff perhaps. ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

• Another reviewer is requested to take a look at this. Gazal world would you likely be available to re-review this nomination? ─ The Aafī (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

• New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT0 is interesting; hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done. ALT0 good to go. --Gazal world (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)